back actual schedules and run times with a commitment to utilizing the aid of the ATU
bus operators in the new service plan for board approval.
Simon Brown, People’s Transit Alliance, requested that any changes to routes that
riders depend on work for the operators themselves. Brown urged that any proposed
changes after public hearings get approval from ATU after feedback and input from
operators on run times and frequencies.
Valerie McGraw requested schedules with realistic run times that make bus service
reliable and safe for everyone, noting that means current and future schedules should
consider the local speed limits, realistic run times, and the availability of adequate
break areas and bathrooms for operators. McGraw added that the Board to really listen
to operators when finalizing run times and bus frequencies in the updated schedules.
Laurel Paget-Seekins, Public Advocates, commented that previous management
statements to use the riders and bus operator’s statements and experiences about bus
schedules toward improving the realign plan do not appear to be true. Paget-Seekins
emphasized the importance of taking action while believing the workers and riders.
Dave Lyons, ATU 192, commented on the way the concerns of bus operators today
mirror the concerns of bus operators 44 years ago. Lyons noted that bus operators
would feel less frustrated and more cared about with access to clean bathrooms.
Miguel, People's Transit Alliance, expressed solidarity with the drivers and emphasized
the need for guidance from the Union and providing necessary facilities. Miguel urged
management to consider ATU and their drivers as a primary resource in developing
schedules for new routes.
James Johnson, ATU System Business Agent, reiterated the need for management to
focus on addressing the concerns of the ridership and operators. Johnson commented
that continued discussion is needed with each party to come to agreement to produce
an agreeable outcome and overcome the many issues that are disagreed upon.
Michelle Pryor, commented that the Board should defer to the opinions of the union
bus operators regarding the efficiency improvements needed for Realign.
Michai Freeman, expressed support for ATU bus operators, noting that inadequate
bathroom breaks is not equitable. Freeman requested the Board to better address the
needs of the riders.
Sheela Gunn, Center for Independent Living, commented on the importance of a safe
and comfortable transportation system for people with disabilities and access needs.
Gunn argued that drivers should not have to endure inadequate scheduling which
affect basic needs such as bathroom breaks. Gunn also commented on rider issues with
smokers in bus shelters and incorrect classification of bus benches as ‘comfort’ items
when they are a necessity for older and disabled riders.
Aleta Dupree commented on the 7 & 29, 57, NL, & F bus lines. Dupree added support
for the continued operation of the Paratransit bus service.
Dylan Fabris urged the Board to approve the network plan after finalizing run times and
frequencies with ATU final approval, suggesting several operational and policy ideas to
improve bus operator efficiency and operator and rider comfort.
Emily Wheeler, Public Advocates, commented on the responsibility of AC Transit to
keep its employees safe, heathy, and happy and asked the Board for final approval on
route changes only after the Union has signed off on the run times and frequencies,
and to add run and recovery time to existing routes, taking into account changes to
speed limits. Wheeler also calls for A/C transit to pass a Board policy creating standard
