TO: AC Transit Board of Directors
FROM: Salvador Llamas, General Manager/Chief Executive Officer
SUBJECT: Relocation Limit Exception
ACTION ITEM
AGENDA PLANNING REQUEST: ☐
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Title
Consider approving an exception to Board Policy 226 - Relocation Policy granting the General Manager authority to approve an additional $20,000 in relocation expense reimbursement for the newly hired Chief Operating Officer (COO).
Staff Contact:
Salvador Llamas, General Manager/Chief Executive Officer
James Arcellana, Executive Director of Human Resources
Body
STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE:
Goal - High-Performing Workforce
Initiative - Employee Recruitment, Training and Retention
Approving the additional relocation expense reimbursement amount for the newly hired COO ensures the District will continue to attract and retain top executive talent. This will support a smooth transition for the newly hired COO and reflects the District’s commitment to competitive hiring practices.
BUDGETARY/FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval of this exception to Board Policy 226 (Attachment 1), will cost the District up to $20,000 in receipt-based reimbursements and/or payments for actual costs incurred. While this amount was not budgeted for, there are funds available in the Operations Department budget from savings in other areas that will be used to pay the expense.
BACKGROUND/RATIONALE:
The District’s new Chief Operating Officer will begin employment on September 2, 2025, relocating with his partner and children from Indianapolis, Indiana, to the Bay Area. Board Policy 226 permits the General Manager to reimburse up to $10,000 in relocation expenses, and that full amount has already been authorized. The limit set in Board Policy 226 was set in 2016. Staff believes it is in need of an increase and will be coming back to the board to update the policy at a later date.
The costs for a family to move cross-country could easily exceed the policy limit. Approving an exception to the limit in Board Policy 226 will help prevent the new COO from incurring unnecessary personal costs.
Standard Moving Expenses That May be Reimbursed Include
• Transportation of household goods and personal effects (van line, container, or DIY truck)
• Materials necessary for the packing and transport of household goods and personal effects
• Transportation of personal vehicles
• 30-day storage of household goods after arrival (if needed)
• Travel for employee & family to new home (choose one):
• Airfare for four (IND → OAK)
• Or, Driving personal vehicle (cost of fuel and lodging)
The existing $10,000 cap will not cover the expenses necessary for the COO to move his partner and children across country. In 2019, the COO moved from the Bay Area to Indiana and incurred moving costs of just over $20,000 (Attachment 2). The estimate for the cost of moving his household goods and personal effects to back to the Bay Area for his new role with the District has come in at just under $25,000 (Attachment 3). This does not include the cost of travel for the new COO and his family and as the bill for his move in 2019 indicates, the final cost can easily end up being more than the estimate.
Granting an additional $20,000 brings total reimbursement to $30,000 and makes it less likely that the new COO will incur financial losses as a result of their move. This is also aligned with industry benchmarks for executive relocations of similar scope. In April of 2025, BART approved a $25,000 relocation reimbursement package for its newly hired District Secretary, (Attachment 4).
It is important to note that the new COO will not be given a lump sum of money, they will be reimbursed based on receipts and/or funds will be paid directly to a moving company, pursuant to Board Policy. If the total cost of their move is less than the approved amount, the remainder of the funds will not be spent.
Historical Precedent
The Board has previously exercised its authority to approve relocation costs in a comparable circumstance when the District hired a Director who had to move across country:
GM Memo 08-161 (June 25 , 2008) - approved relocation costs of “approximately $50,000” for the relocation of the newly hired Director of Service Supervision from Florida to the Bay Area. (Attachment 5). This action was taken pursuant to Board Resolution 1180, which was the controlling authority for relocation expenses at the time.
ADVANTAGES/DISADVANTAGES:
The advantage to approving the additional relocation reimbursement funds is that it will allow the COO to transition quickly without financial strain, demonstrates AC Transit’s competitiveness in attracting top talent, and can be funded through existing savings with no impact on service levels.
The only disadvantage is that it commits up to $20,000 that could otherwise revert to reserves or be reallocated.
ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS:
Staff evaluated three options:
Maintain the $10,000 cap. Leaves the COO responsible for any relocation costs above this amount, potentially impairing recruitment reputation.
Approve a smaller exception (e.g., $10,000). Reduces fiscal impact but still underfunds expected expenses and offers limited competitive advantage.
Recommended - Approve the $20,000 exception. Provides a combined $30,000 reimbursement, matching realistic relocation costs while maintaining fiscal responsibility.
Staff recommends Option 3 as the minimum assistance necessary to defray actual relocation expenses and maintain AC Transit’s competitiveness in executive hiring.
PRIOR RELEVANT BOARD ACTION/POLICIES:
• Board Policy 226 - Relocation Policy
• GM Memo No. 08-161, authorizing relocation expenses for the Director of Service Supervision
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Board Policy 226
2. Moving costs for COO’s move in 2019
3. BART Executive Decision Document Approving Relocation Expense
4. GM Memo No. 08-161
Prepared by:
James Arcellana, Executive Director of Human Resources
Approved/Reviewed by:
James Arcellana, Interim Executive Director of Human Resources
Aimee L. Steele, General Counsel/Chief Legal Officer
Chris Andrichak, Chief Financial Officer