AC Transit Logo
 
Report ID: 20-059   
Type: Regular - External Affairs
Meeting Body: Board of Directors - Regular Meeting
Meeting Date: 1/22/2020 Final action: 1/22/2020
Recommended Action: Consider approving an amendment to Board Policy 702 - Conflicts of Interest and Standards for Ethical Conduct
Attachments: 1. STAFF REPORT, 2. Att.1. Proposed Amendment to BP 702, 3. Master Minute Order

TO:                                          AC Transit Board of Directors                                          

FROM:                                          Denise C. Standridge, General Counsel

SUBJECT:                     Board Policy 702 - Conflicts of Interest and Standards for Ethical Conduct                     

 

ACTION ITEM


RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

 

Title

Consider approving an amendment to Board Policy 702 - Conflicts of Interest and Standards for Ethical Conduct

Body

 

STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE:

 

Goal - Strong Public and Policymaker Support

 

The proposed amendment is in furtherance of ethical conduct by all persons involved in closed session discussions, which will garner public and policymaker support.

 

BUDGETARY/FISCAL IMPACT:

 

The proposed amendment does not have a budgetary or fiscal impact.

 

BACKGROUND/RATIONALE:

 

Recently, the Board faced an issue involving one of its directors disclosing confidential information from Closed Session. As a result, the Board requested an opinion from outside counsel. Arising out of this situation, it is recommended that the Board amend Board Policy 702 to provide language allowing for the exclusion of a Director, or anyone involved in closed session, who violates the confidentiality of closed session. No other amendments to this policy are recommended at this time.

 

ADVANTAGES/DISADVANTAGES:

 

The advantage of this proposed amendment is to provide the Board a remedy to exclude a Director when s/he violates the confidentiality of closed session.  There is no disadvantage of this proposed amendment.

 

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS:

 

The alternative is to leave the policy as is without the exclusion language. This is not recommended as the exclusion possibility provides the Board with an additional remedy and is less severe than going to the Grand Jury or seeking an injunction.

 

PRIOR RELEVANT BOARD ACTION/POLICIES:

 

Board Policy 702 - Conflicts of Interest and Standards for Ethical Conduct.                     

ATTACHMENTS:

 

1.                     Proposed Amendment to Board Policy 702

 

Prepared by:

Denise C. Standridge, General Counsel

 

Approved/Reviewed by:

Michael A. Hursh, General Manager

Linda A. Nemeroff, District Secretary