AC Transit Logo
 
Report ID: 21-453   
Type: Regular - Board Administrative Matters
Meeting Body: Board of Directors - Regular Meeting
Meeting Date: 9/22/2021 Final action: 9/22/2021
Recommended Action: Consider the adoption of Resolution No. 21-038 authorizing the AC Transit Board of Directors and all District Advisory, Oversight, Steering and Inter-Agency Liaison Committees to continue to meet remotely during a declared state of emergency, subject to the requirements outlined in Assembly Bill 361.
Attachments: 1. STAFF REPORT, 2. Att.1. Resolution 21-038, 3. Master Minute Order
TO: AC Transit Board of Directors
FROM: Linda A. Nemeroff, District Secretary
SUBJECT: Remote Brown Act Meetings

ACTION ITEM

RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Title
Consider the adoption of Resolution No. 21-038 authorizing the AC Transit Board of Directors and all District Advisory, Oversight, Steering and Inter-Agency Liaison Committees to continue to meet remotely during a declared state of emergency, subject to the requirements outlined in Assembly Bill 361.
Body

STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE:

There is no strategic importance associated with this report.

BUDGETARY/FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no budgetary or fiscal impact associated with this report.

BACKGROUND/RATIONALE:

AB 361 (Rivas) was signed into law on June 16, 2021 and takes immediate effect as an urgency measure to allow legislative bodies to continue to hold remote meetings during the pandemic. More specifically, this legislation allows local agencies to use teleconferencing without having to comply with the requirements of the Brown Act, provided that the legislative body meets "other requirements" (outlined later in this report) in any of the following circumstances:

(A) The legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency, and state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing.
(B) The legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency for the purpose of determining, by majority vote, whether as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health and safety if attendees.
(C) The legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency and has determined, by majority vote, pursuant to subparagraph (B), that, as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health and safety of attendees.

In addition, if a state of emergency remains active, or state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing, i...

Click here for full text